Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Lakers | Main | Rumsfeld's Coming Court Problem »

    May 01, 2006

    Comments

    KipEsquire

    You do realize I hope that this has been going on since the 1950s, as part of the Red Scare.

    Just like adding "under God" to the Pledge of Allegiance.

    For a far more recent example of related silliness, see Senator Robert Byrd's "Constitution Day."

    Homelessapien

    Is anybody else disturbed by the phrase "year of our lord" in there. That can't in anyway be construed as a general, non-descript lord, as it is by definition the lord of Christ. Shouldn't we, at least in official government documents and proclamations, be using C.E. (Common Era).

    Rob Riutta

    I really find the mention of "our Lord" disturbing and inappropriate. I also, however, have to ask: do you think he read this and, if so, do you think he found it chuckle-worthy?

    Huntington

    Never mind if our Lord read this and chuckled; do you think Bush and Gonzales were holding their sides, tears streaming down their faces, convulsed with mirth as Bush signed it?

    The comments to this entry are closed.