Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Iraq's new P.M., quite the peacemaker | Main | The WH's Iran Bluster Plans »

    April 21, 2006

    Comments

    Randy Paul

    There's also probably one leader in the West who would probably like to shore up his sagging poll ratings. I would not be surprised if he believes attacking Iran is the way to do it.

    Given his general cluelessness (witness the bait he takes from Hugo Chávez every time Chávez waves it) as well as such statements about the insurgency as "bring it on", I feel compelled to worry about this.

    By the way, the poedant in me needs to point out that it's "who's" not "whose."

    Eric Umansky

    Though I'd like to think that even our president isn't that foolish--there's not exactly a lot of evidence to support that. Which is why, as I wrote last week, that I hope there continue to be reports that the administration is thinking of going after Iran. I think people will react strongly against it:
    http://www.ericumansky.com/2006/04/the_iran_plans.html

    Eric Umansky

    p.s. fixed that typo. thanks.

    Randy Paul

    Of course I have a lot of nerve spelling pedant "poedant!"

    dopey-o

    i'll see you a faulklands and raise you an israel. suppose iran has some spare parts from russia, and some drawings from pakistan? and they've already got a couple of small nukes? wouldn't a bombing or invasion be just the perfect excuse to incinerate tel aviv? maybe the radical mullahs want us to attack their bunkers and silos and underground labs.

    i don't know about the rest of the country, but i'd hate to be known as the guys who touched off the second holocaust because we just had to show those mullahs who's the toughest hombre.

    The comments to this entry are closed.