Atta's full name is Mohamed Mohamed el-Amir Awad el-Sayed Atta. That's what was on his passport and if you look carefully on his U.S. visa issued in May of 2000. The name he went by before that--the name he used for example on email--is Mohamed el-Amir. Atta didn't go by "Mohamed Atta" until the late spring of 2000, after Able Danger supposedly ID'd him.
UPDATE: Here's the flight manifest from the trip Atta took to Pakitan in November 1999 and his return to Hamburg in February of 2000. On both legs of the flight, the records identify him simply as Mohamed al-Amir.
The documents come courtesy of Terry McDermott, the LAT reporter who wrote the 9/11 hijackers history Perfect Soldiers. McDermott wrote me earlier tonight that "Atta used Mohamed el-Amir in Germany and Egypt almost exclusively. Even his residence papers and school enrollment forms in Germany used ‘Amir.’ If someone id'd him as Atta in the US before march [2000] it seems to contradict all the documentation. Even his father didn't go by the name 'Atta.' In fact, the first month I was in Cairo, I couldn't find anything about Atta because I was looking for 'Atta.' ”
P.S. Maybe the Able Danger crew was savvy to all this. Somehow, given the Pentagon's inability to find confirming documents, I doubt it.
By the way, forgetting about names for a moment, the email in particular is just fascinating.
Note: I've edited this post, adding Atta's full name and his passport.
good catch, but what's with the Word attachment? Not everyone uses Word out on the internets.
Posted by: rabbitsnake | August 23, 2005 at 09:57 AM
They're just bad scans anyway -- may as well post them as images rather than embedding them in Word docs.
Posted by: Rafe | August 23, 2005 at 10:13 AM
But the name Atta does appear on the scanned visa.
"Mohamed Mohamed Elamir" is indeed written under "Given Name." If you look at the line above, however, you'll see the word "Atta" (possibly under the heading "Surname"?).
Also, the name Atta shows up in the string of code at the bottom of the page.
Posted by: Certaldo | August 23, 2005 at 11:01 AM
Just want to make sure no one gets too far out on this evidence -- specifically, the visa.
Just look at this clear copy of a U.S. visa:
http://www.isso.cornell.edu/immigration/visas/visastamp.html
The second line -- where the name "Atta" appears on the scanned image -- is the "surname."
So I don't understand how this piece of evidence proves that Able Danger couldn't have ID'ed him as Atta before May 2000. He clearly identifies himself as "Mohammed Mohammed Elamir Atta" on the visa in question.
Posted by: Certaldo | August 23, 2005 at 11:44 AM
This may be a moot point based on Certaldo's comment but I'm not sure I understand what the origninal issue was. Even if he didn't refer to himself as Atta back in 2000, "Atta" appears to be the short hand name people use for him today. Isn't this analgous to Howard Cosell using the name Muhammad Ali in 1970 to refer to a boxer he once covered under the name Cassius Clay in 1965?
Is there something one of the AD guys is quoted as having said about the name that McDermott sees as a direct contradiction?
Posted by: Anodyne | August 23, 2005 at 12:03 PM
I have been writing about secret thought reading technology in use by the FBI and military (based on Dr. Begich's book "Angels Don't Play this HAARP") since 1994. The military could launder info gained from this technology by attributing it's source to data mining such as was employed by the Able Danger unit. And I notice in your article 'Weldon's Able Danger Now Has a Voice' that Tony Shaffer refers to acquiring information via 'neural networking'. It could be this technology.
It would also explain why the military did not share their information with the F.B.I. I believe there has been alot of concern regarding the domestic use of this technology, the lack of disclosure in trials, and the victimization of people like myself. I think that the military has deliberately distanced themselves from their use of this technology having any impact domestically. In the end, when this technology is exposed, it could be outlawed domestically, but still have a viable use for military operations outside of the U.S.
Kathleen T. Heckman
echoes44442002@yahoo.com
Posted by: Kathy Heckman | August 23, 2005 at 12:16 PM
The underlying issue is that Weldon claims to have seen a chart produced by AD in January-February 2000 that included Mohammed Atta's name. By contrast, the Pentagon has now publicly stated that they possess no evidence that the unit identified the hijacker. As Kevin Drum recently wrote, somebody is lying.
If the visa posted above had identified him as simply Mohammed Mohammed Elamir, then it would support the argument that Weldon, et al, are full of it. Unfortunately, the visa appears to identify him as Mohammed Mohammed Elamir Atta. So I'm not quite sure why we're even talking about it.
The more compelling evidence, highlighted by Kaus (http://www.slate.com/id/2124863/),
is that, while AD might have identified a Mohammed Atta, it's possible that it wasn't the same Atta that took part in the 9/11 attacks.
Posted by: certaldo | August 23, 2005 at 12:21 PM
As Kevin Drum recently wrote, somebody is lying.
If the visa posted above had identified him as simply Mohammed Mohammed Elamir, then it would support the argument that Weldon, et al, are full of it. Unfortunately, the visa appears to identify him as Mohammed Mohammed Elamir Atta. So I'm not quite sure why we're even talking about it.
It is not a question of lying it is a question of everyone in the blogsphere using this to prove a political point and screwing themselves up...Especially Drum and Rozen.
Your comment that it is "unfortuante" that the visa "supports Weldon" is telling.
Weldon may be a jackass, but he is perfectly correct so far on this despite the mass of disinformation on the blogsphere. don't jump the gun and sacrifice truth. understanding 9/11 and the profound failures of BOTH the Bush and Clinton administrations is the issue that needs to be look at thoughtfully and without bias.
Posted by: | August 23, 2005 at 08:25 PM
Well, it is possible Mohamed Atta went by Mohamed el-Amir since that IS the name his father goes by. So all these marginal issues about his visa and passport (not one in the same) are interesting but do not mean it is not possible.
Eric, check out this weirdness
http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/565
Posted by: AJStrata | August 23, 2005 at 08:36 PM
I'm not sure what the hold-up is... maybe they have re-thought their stance on how this is going to actually make the company any money. Or perhaps their lawyers pointed out the liability of providing agents a platform to stick their feet in their mouth. Whatever it is, it's hardly something I'd claim as being "Well done".
www.jebshouse.com
Posted by: Jeb Simons | April 26, 2008 at 07:16 PM
hm... amazing :)
Posted by: Anal Squirting Movie | October 17, 2009 at 09:33 AM
Wow - very cool issue. I'm going to write about it as well!
Posted by: FribialArie | December 11, 2009 at 08:41 PM
HAARP is the subject of numerous conspiracy theories, with individuals ascribing various hidden motives and capabilities to the project. Journalist Sharon Weinberger called HAARP "the Moby Dick of conspiracy theories" and said the popularity of conspiracy theories often overshadows the benefits HAARP may provide to the scientific community. Skeptic computer scientist David Naiditch called HAARP "a magnet for conspiracy theorists", saying the project has been blamed for triggering catastrophes such as floods, droughts, hurricanes, thunderstorms, and devastating earthquakes in Afghanistan and the Philippines aimed to "shake up" terrorists.
Posted by: generic viagra | April 14, 2010 at 05:52 PM
According to the HAARP team, this will advance the study of basic natural processes that occur in the ionosphere under the natural but much stronger influence of solar interaction.
Posted by: generic propecia | April 29, 2010 at 05:24 PM
I can never imagine that how person can go to different countries with different id's and no body actually identify him. Very interesting information about this this person.
For refurbished laptops log on to http://www.electrocomputerwarehouse.com
Posted by: cheap computer | June 01, 2010 at 03:45 AM
The aggressive could acquit advice acquired from this technology by advertence it's antecedent to abstracts mining such as was active by the Able Danger unit.
Posted by: Vimax | June 06, 2010 at 12:28 AM
They're just bad scans anyway -- may as well post them as images rather than embedding them in Word docs.
Posted by: Jerseys | July 19, 2010 at 09:24 PM
There should be a change in system. After reading this blog the very first question raised in my mind was How one can travel in different countries by different name? It means that there is a error in system which should be rectified else its going to be a huge destruction.
Posted by: Refurbished Laptops | July 28, 2010 at 02:54 AM
Perhaps this is one of the most interesting blogs that I have ever seen. Interesting article, Funny comment. Keep it up!
Posted by: replica jerseys | August 04, 2010 at 11:10 PM
Journalist Sharon Weinberger called HAARP "the Moby Dick of conspiracy theories" and said the popularity of conspiracy theories often overshadows the benefits HAARP may provide to the scientific community.
Posted by: ClubPenguin | August 07, 2010 at 04:43 AM
This is a serious issue...Need to discuss in very deep...
Posted by: Cheap Computers | August 25, 2010 at 05:26 PM
I like it a lot guys thank you
Posted by: viagra bestellen kaufen | August 30, 2010 at 08:04 PM
For the world civilization, as humans, to build the happiness, I created the national youth, the family, the national youth, the youth, the earth and human youth, the universe by its infinite.Do you think so?
Posted by: Nike Shox Rivalry | September 17, 2010 at 02:30 AM
I love that they spin imoving the peak mail date so that it's all about the postal workers and not moving their merchandise up to the last minute (my best guess). And that there's a Postmaster on the committe.
http://www.buyonline-rx.com/ed.html
http://www.buyonline-rx.com/sitemap.html
Posted by: Impotence causes | September 30, 2010 at 08:19 PM
Well there's always a mistake which makes this more and more.
Posted by: Cheap Computers | October 09, 2010 at 05:21 AM